Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Duane " Dog " Chapman His 5 mins Racist Rant Phone Call

Duration: 05:12 minutes
Upload Time: 2007-11-01 17:36:41
User: RummyProductions
:::: Favorites
:::: Top Videos of Day
Description:

PLS COMMENT PLS COMMENT PLS COMMENT Dog Chapman has been captured spewing foul-mouthed racist slurs on a tape obtained exclusively by The NATIONAL ENQUIRER. And now a civil rights leader is calling for Dog's TV show to be removed from the airwaves. In a shocking world exclusive The ENQUIRER has obtained tapes of two revolting phone conversations in which Duane "Dog" Chapman unleashes a filthy bigoted attack, littered with the N-word and other disgusting racial insults. The star of the A&E reality show Dog, The Bounty Hunter directed his racist hatred at his son Tucker's girlfriend Monique Shinnery, who is black. "Dog Chapman should not have a show. That show should be taken off the air!" That's the opinion of prominent civil rights leader Roy Innis, who has served as the chairman of the Congress for Racial Equality (CORE) since 1968. Innis was shocked and outraged when The ENQUIRER played Dog Chapman's racist telephone conversations for him. "This man should not be held up as a role model for children," Innis told The ENQUIRER. "He has venom deep in his soul. This is a picture of his heart — a revelation of his true nature. Innis believes that cable network A&E needs to take swift action in response to Dog's vicious outburst. "He needs to answer for his behavior," says Innis. "When someone gets the opportunity to use the airwaves, he becomes a role model, whether he likes it or not. Dog Chapman should not be in that position, posing as a good guy. "His comments show that he certainly is not a good guy." Full details are in the new issue of the NATIONAL ENQUIRER. Update: In response to this story, A&E network has released a statement saying: "A&E has just learned of the story released by the National Enquirer concerning Duane Dog Chapman. We take this matter very seriously. Pending an investigation, we have suspended production on the series. When the inquiry is concluded we will take appropriate action." Listen to the audio

Comments

lictor313 ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:01:13

how do I have a limited vocabulary- AGAIN WHY ARE YOU SHIFTING THE ONUS BACK ONTO ME... Do I have a limited vocabulary ? DO you have difficulty understanding the words that are typed here? you have a very flawed and dangerous understanding of our legal system and really defective way of viewing the world...
__________________________________________________
lictor313 ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:03:55

loooooooooooool READ "THE LAW" (I bet you its a good book perhaps you could direct me towards a copy?) who publishes it?
__________________________________________________
oneasha ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:10:04

it says it's legal when THE PERSON (Tucker) is a party to the communication, OR when one of them has given prior consent. Read it again, but sloooooow. a limited vocabulary, AND poor reading comprehension. I may have responded negatively to one of your posts, but I never got hostile. That's YOUR thing. I haven't turned anything around on you, only responded to your drivel - for too long now.
__________________________________________________
oneasha ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:12:07

You just told a petite single mother she needs to get worked over with a tire iron, and you can't see how you have deep-seated issues?
__________________________________________________
oneasha ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:14:38

If you're going to resort to violence I'd be happy to just let you win the argument. It's not worth all that. If you need it that bad, just let me know. Random acts of kindness are fun.
__________________________________________________
lictor313 ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:16:37

Hmmmm hawaii recording laws a tad different... Haw. Rev. Stat. � 803-42: "Any wire, oral or electronic communication (including cellular phone calls) can lawfully be recorded by a person who is a party to the communication, or when one of the parties has consented to the recording, so long as no criminal or tortious purpose exists." open your eyes to this one::::: "Unlawful interceptions or disclosures of private communications are punishable as felonies."
__________________________________________________
lictor313 ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:20:08

did you get that ghetto boo, "Unlawful interceptions or disclosures of private communications are punishable as felonies." hmmm now did this qualify as a private conversation??? ah yeah.... which makes your argument moot.
__________________________________________________
oneasha ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:22:38

Hawaii has government websites with their laws. Google "Hawaii surveillance laws", and look at the government sites - not whatever crap you've been looking at. Also, why don't you look and see if Tucker is still free, because he wouldn't be if there was evidence he broke any law. Parole officers don't care for that. You made it through an entire post without resorting to using vulgar language, or sharing violent fantasies. Congrats!
__________________________________________________
lictor313 ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:28:54

loool i quoted directly from gvt sources- and even got the same paragraph you reproduced it from (from which btw you cleverly and fiendishly leave out the fact that it is in fact a felony to publish or disclose anything contained in a private conversation... he's not in jail because no court proceedings have occurred yet- and his dad didnt press charges yet, take THAT little ghetto star jones hack... go fry up some chicken and chitlins and shiet...
__________________________________________________
oneasha ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:33:01

I never edited ANYTHING, you're not on the same site as me. And his parole officer wouldn't need criminal proceedings to happen, and those proceedings WON'T happen because he broke no law.
__________________________________________________
oneasha ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:33:04

And with this one right here, technically you attacked my mother first, and then me, oh hostile one. I am mixed, my daughter is mixed, and odds are you're mixed as well. So your whole thing isn't even that this has been blown out of proportion, it's just that blacks are no good, and racism is okay? Issues, issues, issues.
__________________________________________________
oneasha ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:34:21

Honestly, man, I'm done. I thought you were just some ignorant Dog fan on here defending him. Now I see you're an actual racist, and a hostile, violent one at that. You're not worth my time. Find peace. Goodbye.
__________________________________________________
lictor313 ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:38:51

are you fucking serious- i quoted FROM THE SAME PARAGRAPH, FROM YOUR OWN SOURCE. AND WHY WOULD THERE BE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS !?!??! ITS A FELONY! Why are you talking about parole officers? Read that paragraph over dumb dumb, cmon fess up you know you just completely lost face here... be a credit to your race and concede your mistake- cmon! people with ghetto names like you make em all the time anyways!
__________________________________________________
lictor313 ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:49:00

i fucking detest that show! and Dog is a fucking psycho piece of white trash - and i feel sorry that he is a member of my ethnicity trust me. I feel only contempt for him and his disgusting, worthless, barely literate psycho family.... but why do you want to make using the word NIGGER in a private conversation A CRIMINAL OFFENCE? and why do you associate ppl who use the word nigger with pedophiles? PLease take me down the road of how this makes sense fromt he perspective of a neegress.
__________________________________________________
oneasha ::: Favorites  2007-11-17 04:53:39

You're a racist, you're ignorant almost by definition. I don't have to fight to beat you. Also, I like my name and have never lived in a ghetto in my life. My name is usually the first thing to be made fun of by racists. You're not original, and I'm not hurt. I got the info on a Hawaii "local government" website.
__________________________________________________

No comments: